[ad_1]
When Sciver-Brunt suddenly became available to all clubs in the second half, the WBBL Scorchers had the salary cap space to sign him, although a deal had yet to be finalized. But it left Lanning and Stars angry at Sciver-Brunt and the WBBL.
“[We’re] “I was actually very disappointed,” Lanning said.
“She’s obviously one of the best players in the world and wants the best players to play in the competition,” Lanning said on Tuesday. “But she made herself unavailable at first.
“All the players of her caliber have been through the draft or pre-signed, and I don’t think she was in the running for it.
“As a club, as the stars, I certainly feel like we didn’t have the opportunity to exercise the retention rights that we would have given her had she been drafted instead of coming in that way.
“Not only does it affect us this year, it also affects us now because Perth have retention rights.
“It’s frustrating because I think the goal posts seem to change a little bit and we haven’t had the opportunity to get to them.
“It’s disappointing, but I think that’s the way it goes and we’re looking forward to playing Perth and playing well against them and the team.”
“If there is a draft, you probably want to make sure it goes the way you planned, and I’m not sure that will happen in this case.”
Meg Lanning
The Melbourne Renegades drafted Liam Livingstone but lost him to international duty and were able to sign Guptill as a replacement.
Lanning was positive about the concept of an overseas draft in the WBBL but was steadfast in her belief that the rules should not change in its wake.
“I think that [draft] “The concept is good. I think it spreads the international players, really good international players, across different teams and creates some media and some talk, and the clubs have had to really strategize and put their different plans in place along the way,” Lanning said.
“I think that was a good thing. I’m not really sure if this is what we use going forward. But if there’s a draft, you might want to make sure it happens the way you planned. I’m not sure what happened in this case.”
“I think it should be 10 games, that’s just a personal opinion,” Lanning said. “Obviously there’s a lot of other things that go into it that maybe I don’t understand and, as players, we probably don’t deal with it as much as other people do. I think that would create a really good quality competition. I think 14 games is a very long time.” There seems to be a bit of a lull for most teams at some point in the season.
“Maybe it might make it more tempting for international players to come and be a part of it all the time as well.
“It’s an interesting discussion actually because I think a lot of people’s first reaction is that if you go to fewer games, you kind of drop back and fall back. But for me, it’s the opposite. I think that will actually create good quality competition.” “There’s no room for error in terms of playing I think, and you attract the best players and the games are the best to watch and play in. For me, that makes sense. But like I said, there’s a lot more that goes into those decisions than I probably know.” But it will be interesting to see how we get on the right track. “
Alex Malcolm is an associate editor at ESPNcricinfo